Bigstock-Grey-pixel-mosaic-design-backg-107626922

Do You Employ The “Fifty Shades of Grey” Publicist?

E L James is the author of the extremely popular erotic romance trilogy "Fifty Shades of Grey," released in May of 2011 and followed by the movie of the same title on February 13, 2015. This was the author's first novel, but she clearly hit a home run!

Maybe that is where I had my misconnect. I write poetry, some of which is provocative. Believing the new release of the movie would be a great opportunity to connect two pieces of art, I sent a letter via email to Ms. James’ publicist, which included three topic-appropriate poems. Yes, it was gutsy and a stretch, but history is not made by watching other people take action (and neither is money).

Bigstock-Grey-pixel-mosaic-design-backg-107626922It has been a year and I have not heard from Ms. James or her publicist – not even a "We are not interested." It makes me wonder if Ms. James ever even got my letter, or if her publicist independently discarded it without discussion.

When are referrals or opportunities sent to you that you are not aware of? Often.

Just to share a few in my law office I, much too late, learned of:

  1. A resume for an administrative position received by a paralegal and discarded without bringing it to me.
  2. A referral, from a good friend, that wouldn't follow our office procedures and requested a free consult without first attending a workshop. Discarded.
  3. An offer to make a presentation to a nursing home.

Would I have accepted any of the above opportunities? Maybe, but now I have no choice.

  1. I was in fact hiring at the time the resume was discarded.
  2. I would have done pro bono consult to help a colleague.
  3. I would move mountains to get in front of a nursing home administrator.

So why were they discarded? Why was my opinion trumped?

Because of one of two reasons, or both.

  1. Employees who believe they know a) what is best for you or the firm, or b) what you would have said and didn't want to bother you. These are rogue employees in the guise of being independent and efficient.

OR

  1. You haven't been clear on your expectations. A system should be in place for each member of the firm to report opportunities of ALL kinds presented, accepted and rejected. An opportunity in this sense should be defined as "a request of some sort by another person or organization to either the firm or the managing lawyer."

I appreciate efficiency and independence, but I appreciate opportunity even more. The owner or manager of the firm should have the final say to accept or deny.

I feel certain that, had Ms. James been presented with my letter and poetry, she would have taken one of two actions:

  1. Remembered her beginnings and reached out to assist a sister in the arts.

OR

  1. Sent a reply politely denying my request.

Don't your prospects and professional community deserve the same?

What are you missing? What processes can you implement to catch them? What can you do to gently discard the others without leaving them hanging?

Did you know that Lawyers With Purpose has it's own Cloud Based Workflow System specifically for estate and elder law firms?  If you want to learn more about it, join us on Friday, February 26th at 2EST for a FREE live demo! Just click here to reserve your spot now.

Victoria L. Collier, Co-Founder, Lawyers with Purpose, LLC, Certified Elder Law Attorney through the National Elder Law Foundation; Fellow of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys; Founder and Managing Attorney of The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC; Co-Founder of Veterans Advocates Group of America; Entrepreneur; Author; and nationally renowned Presenter.

Jaloza and Team

Congratulations to Andrew Jaloza, Lawyers With Purpose Member of The Month

What is the greatest success you’ve had since joining LWP?  

The greatest success is having created a thriving Estate Planning Practice run by a cohesive team of dedicated people who are passionate about helping as many families as we possibly can.

Jaloza and TeamWhat is your favorite LWP tool?

It is not just the tools but the total client centered systematic approach of the LWP process that has allowed us to quickly go from zero to hero as an Elder Law and Estate Planning firm. 

How has being part of LWP impacted your team and your practice?

We have been impacted by our implementation coach Roz Drotar and our mentor Coach Candace Pollock, both of whom have held us accountable and challenged us to reach our highest possible potential while imparting their years of experience-based suggestions to help us achieve amazing growth over the past year.

Share something about yourself that most people don’t know about you.

Something that people don't know about me is that I am transparent. What you see is truly what you get. 

What is your favorite book and how did it impact your life?

My favorite book is called Man's Search of Meaning by Viktor Frankl. This book has impacted my life because after reading it, it has taught me that everything in your life is a matter of perspective, and how you look at something creates your world.   

 

Bigstock-Breaking-The-Bank-4881450

Is Asset Protection Dead? Pfannenstiehl v. Pfannenstiehl

A recent Massachusetts case throws into question whether long-term asset protection is safe. This particular case was disturbing because the defendant in a divorce proceeding's share in an irrevocable trust from his parents was deemed to be a marital asset and had to be distributed to his ex‑wife. This was a third-party trust, created by the parents for the benefit of their son, that had specific spendthrift provisions to prohibit such an attack. The Massachusetts court deemed otherwise.

So is asset protection planning on its way out? Absolutely not, in light of the fact that the case had several significant factors – and as always, the devil is in the details. First, Massachusetts has a very strong statute regarding marital property interests. Second, the trust had a specific termination date wherein the son was going to get the rest, residue and remainder of his share at a specific date. Third, payments from the trust were made regularly and consistently and stopped on the “eve” of the divorce. And fourth, the trustee had ascertainable distribution standards of health, education, maintenance and support. Finally, it had the ideal plaintiff: the wife who shared two special-needs children with the defendant. Put all of that together and judges will find a way to pierce the trust. So what is one to do?

Bigstock-Breaking-The-Bank-4881450While this case was shocking to many, decisions like this are not a surprise in the Lawyers with Purpose community, which is why we have been recommending certain strategies to safeguard against even the pickiest judges and fact patterns. For example, when traditionally drafting a trust and leaving it to beneficiaries in asset protection trusts, we believe the strongest protection comes from having separate share trusts for each beneficiary, with provisions specific to the needs of the individual beneficiary. Second – and this is the most important part – we believe there should not be ascertainable standards, but rather pure discretionary rights to the trustee. Finally, whenever possible the beneficiary should not be an individual, but rather a class of people. For example, in this case, instead of naming just the son as beneficiary, we would recommend naming the son and his issue as beneficiaries, thereby opening up the class of beneficiaries and enhancing the asset protection. One may be fearful of naming the issue. Well, therein lies the trick. Who is named beneficiary is not ultimately the determining factor of who benefits, but rather who the trustee determines who benefits. Create a class of people the trustee can sprinkle income and/or principal among as they deem appropriate in their absolute discretion (not ascertainable standards).

In the Massachusetts case, this could have solved the problem. How? During the marriage, it is likely most of the regular payments provided to the son were actually used in the marriage for the children or items that the husband and wife benefited from jointly. By opening up the class of people, the trustee could have made distributions directly to the children to provide support for the children that the husband was using the money for anyway. By doing this, it surely indicates the assets were not assets of the husband's, but were truly a third-party trust that, at the discretion of the trustee, was distributed to various members in the class, thereby not making it a marital asset. The defendant could have continued to use proceeds from the trust for the benefit of his special-needs children even after the divorce; in fact, most fathers would not penalize their children for divorcing from their spouse. But the key distinction would be that the husband would have remained in control of the assets rather than having to surrender them to a former spouse, wherein there would be no control.

The challenge today is that too many lawyers are on autopilot when they're drafting trusts – or worse, their trust drafting software system doesn’t allow the customizations and protections that the Lawyers with Purpose client-centered software does. Our client-centered software advises the attorneys and allows them to custom tailor each and every option. In addition, LWP™ attorneys are trained to think like the worst court you can imagine and identify how to create provisions that are not specifically targeted at a particular goal but rather strategically drafted to accommodate multiple objectives.

Click here now to see how our trust drafting software will keep your client's needs always in the front of your planning. 

David J. Zumpano, Esq, CPA, Co-founder Lawyers With Purpose, Founder and Senior Partner of Estate Planning Law Center

Bigstock-Legal-Law-Rules-Community-Just-94090013

Why You Might Be A Trust Mill

Having practiced in the estate planning field for almost 23 years, I'm amazed when I review many trust plans done by lawyers that are still "boilerplate," with nothing distinguishing them other than the names of the client and beneficiaries. Interestingly, even when reviewing trusts created by software systems from well-known organizations in the estate planning industry, I am perplexed about the over-complexity, but also the under-simplicity, of how they work. Most trust systems in the estate planning industry have many options to designate different legal technical phrases and provisions to enter into the trust document. Unfortunately, once an attorney chooses the "standard provisions," nothing else changes in the document but the client names. So while they believe they have a very comprehensive estate planning trust system, they really have a glorified trust mill system (a better mouse trap?).


Bigstock-Legal-Law-Rules-Community-Just-94090013The Lawyers with Purpose client centered document creation system is unparalleled in the industry. It is the only software in the industry that was reverse-engineered. Rather than identifying the specific legal provisions required, it instead identifies the particular needs and goals of the client. Once those goals and needs are determined, the software then allows you to custom tailor every single core element of the trust to accomplish those client objectives. As you complete the client needs and their particular customizations, the software automatically inserts the necessary legal provisions and clauses to accomplish the client goals. No two LWP drafted trusts are ever the same. There are over 5,000 combinations of choices, and that's not even including the customization element in each of the decision levels.

While it sounds scary, the systemization of it makes it quite easy. In fact, it is the only document creation system in the industry that is integrated into a complete estate planning practice module. What does that mean? The marketing, legal technical training, workshop presentation, and client design are all integrated to facilitate and work with each other. Each one supports the other. For example, the initial client educational workshop helps identify the various issues that can be addressed in planning – which flows into the vision meeting, where, based on a series of questions – the client is able to self-select one of five different plans that will accomplish the specific goals the client identified. Next, the design meeting is tailored to focus on the specific plan (legal documents) chosen by the client. Then, the most exciting part: the attorney can customize every single aspect of the general plan to meet the client’s individual needs.

The cherry atop all of this is that the attorney designs the custom plan using specific design templates that permit others in the office to actually draft the trust (the software follows the template, including all customizations). Don't be a trust mill – learn how to put the client first. Client-centered document creation software is the first key. Click here to discover how the Lawyers with Purpose Client Centered Software can transform a mere practice, and discover the impact you can have on your client. Reserve a day and time that works for you now.

David J. Zumpano, Esq, CPA, Co-founder Lawyers With Purpose, Founder and Senior Partner of Estate Planning Law Center

Churchill Law Office Team (1) (1)

Congratulations to Churchill Law Office, Lawyers With Purpose Member of The Month!

Churchill Law Office answered this from a team perspective, not an attorney perspective.  We think it's awesome!  What do you think?

What is the greatest success you’ve had since joining LWP?

Maintaining a successful firm even after crisis occurred when the Attorney was in a car accident.   A large portion of our success is the Actionstep platform and having the technical knowledge within the office to program and automate everything and staying in the black!


Churchill Law Office Team (1) (1)What is your favorite LWP tool?

This is a cop-out, but they are all amazing in that they have assisted us to maintain even in crisis.   The way the stories tie to the Estate Plan Audit, and then the Vision Clarifier have been a massive support in reminding clients of their goals in follow-ups.

How has being part of LWP impacted your team and your practice?

Being able to call for help.  The greatest example is one, Nedra’s constant ideas, two, Candace’s drive to move forward, and most of all, three, without Molly “encouraging”, e.g. “do it”, with regard to us doing Vision’s without the Attorney, we would have had to close the office after Debbie’s accident.

Share something about yourself that most people don’t know about you.

Beth is a very experienced database and lean management trainer!  Beth is a bit of a recluse.

Melissa worked for 14 years in daycare and this is her first office job and has surpassed any assistant we’ve ever had in the office.  Melissa is a HUGE prankster.

John has extensive experience in programming and automates everything in Actionstep beyond its basic programming.  John has played the piano for 30 years.

Debbie is a successful attorney with a secret passion for beading!  She makes most of her own jewelry.

Terry is retired, and was an instructor helicopter with the Guard before joining our team.  He makes a mean chocolate chip cookie for the clients.

What is your favorite book and how did it impact your life?

John – Technical programming books.  It has advanced his piano recording and office efficiency.

Melissa – To Kill a Mockingbird – It makes her sound more sophisticated when asked what her favorite book is.

Beth – Machine that Changed the World – Has simplified her life both at home and work through lean management.

Debbie – The Biology of Belief – Helps her to grow spiritually.

Terry – Killer Angels – Loves history and it a great portray of struggle, honor, and patriotism.

 

Bigstock-Touch---5687052

Do You Hold Your Client’s Hand Through The Planning Process…

I was walking to the park with my daughter when she asked me to hold her hand. There is no feeling like my child’s hand in my own. But I was confused when, as we were holding hands, my daughter said, “No, Mommy, hold my hand.” I thought I was. I was not. Rather, I was letting her hold my hand. My fingers were still outstretched and not wrapped around her hand. She wanted the security of my hand holding her tightly.

In our law firms, how often do we believe we are holding our client’s hand when actually we are not? We feel we are providing a top-notch service but we are not. Are we holding their hand or really just letting them hold ours?


Bigstock-Touch---5687052Becoming eligible for and applying for veterans benefits is complicated. The client must be instructed step-by-step through the process. The same is true for Medicaid applicants. From the time the client engages our services through the receipt of a benefits award, we are regularly communicating and giving instruction. I know we have stopped holding their hand when the client calls and says, “Why isn’t this going faster?” or “I’ve paid all this money and I don’t think we’ve gotten our money’s worth,” or “It just doesn’t feel worth this trouble,” or “I wish I had not even hired you.”

Those are not words you want to hear from a client. They are often followed by words that sound like “refund.” It is easy to get defensive and blame the system or the VA. But what is really happening? We have stopped holding our client’s hand and just let them hold ours. We have stopped providing them the security they need to feel safe and confident in us.

Perhaps not everyone on the team even knows they are supposed to hold your client’s hand. My marketing director was speaking with a nursing home administrator during a synergy meeting. The nursing home administrator asked, “Do you hold your client’s hand through the process?” My marketing director said, “Oh, no, we don’t hold their hands.” When I heard that, I was confounded. How could he say such a thing when we work so hard to please our clients? His definition and my definition of holding hands was different. Just like when I was holding my daughter’s hand, her definition was different from mine. Her expectation was different from mine.

I encourage you to review your office procedures and processes. Are you providing to your client the sense of security you believe you are providing? Are you meeting the expectations you have given your clients? Where can you more securely hold their hand? Just a slight adjustment will make a huge difference to them. Now, when I hold my daughter’s hand, I pay close attention to ensure that my fingers wrap around her hand, as she wants, expects and needs.

If you would like a free eBook and discover the secret smart estate and elder law attorneys use to run their practice and generate success by design rather than default click here to download "The Five Essential Roles For A Successful Practice".

Victoria L. Collier, Co-Founder, Lawyers with Purpose, LLC, Certified Elder Law Attorney through the National Elder Law Foundation; Fellow of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys; Founder and Managing Attorney of The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC, www.ElderLawGeorgia.com; Co-Founder of Veterans Advocates Group of America; Entrepreneur; Author; and nationally renowned Presenter.

Bigstock----goals--New-Year-resoluti-99023981

Top Paralegal Resolutions For 2016

Some of you have probably already made – and broken – your New Year’s resolutions for 2016, to include common personal ones like losing weight, doing more exercise, eating better, and quitting bad habits. However, consider making and sticking with some work-related resolutions as well as personal ones to keep you on track professionally. The following list from the paralegal perspective, but it can be applied to any position in your law firm.

FOCUS – January is the time to revisit time templates or to resolve to go back to good habits allowed to lapse, like using planning organizers. Lawyers with Purpose provides you with time management tools as well as a range of focusers, including those for daily, weekly, and monthly planning. Make sure your time template has time devoted to planning each and every week. Time spent planning will be repaid in increased efficiency and goal attainment. Every year I make myself a New Year’s gift of a great calendar as a reward for planning ahead. This calendar can be paper or digital, whatever your preference.


Bigstock----goals--New-Year-resoluti-99023981EDUCATE
– Plan and prepare for further career development by identifying where the gaps in your knowledge and experience are, and deciding how to go about filling those. Or perhaps you want to hone part of your existing skill set. The mind, like many other tools, needs to be kept sharp to work at its best. Lawyers with Purpose offers you various ways of keeping informed and educated, including ListServs for BOTH the attorneys and their team members, blogs, and webinars on the event calendar.  There are also the Tri-Annual Practice Enhancement Retreats (TAPER), which offer legal-technical focus sessions in addition to firm planning and personal development.

CHECK IN with your goals and/or set new ones. It’s been roughly three months since TAPER in Phoenix, so it’s the midpoint of the period during which many of you resolved to implement some projects. Have your efforts lost steam? This is a great time to reassess derailed projects and set tasks to get them back on track. If you did not attend the last TAPER event, now is a great time to set new goals. There are tools on the LWP website that you can use in your "Brainstorming Sprints", as well as project focusers like the "Money Plan" and "The Implementation Focuser". 

RENEW your commitment to the system. Have you been so busy doing the work that you haven’t had time to do the necessary data input crucial for tracking? Regardless of what file management system you may use or whether you are still using paper files or have gone completely digital, attorneys must allow time for their team members to perform all the file maintenance required. If you don’t schedule regular maintenance – just like a car – the engine starts to run rough and may stall. Remember, it may just take 10 minutes to make a phone call, but it can take 5 minutes more to document the phone call, potentially mark a task complete and then schedule a follow-up task. In a typical work day for the law firm, I spend easily an hour of my time on file maintenance alone – adding file notes, scanning and uploading documents, marking tasks done, scheduling follow-up tasks, updating status of file in workflow, linking emails. It is this maintenance that permits you to track the work being done in your firm and hold team members accountable. Pull up your reports and identify where clean up must occur and schedule time on your template to chip away at any overdue file maintenance.

Finally APPLY the 4 D’s of time management – delete, delay, delegate, and do – to any and all of your lists and/or piles in your office. There are variations of these terms, so feel free to adopt the version that makes the most sense to you and your job responsibilities. With this strategy, you review incomplete tasks and decide whether you are going to delete, delay, delegate, or do the task. If a task is no longer important or relevant, or perhaps is already done, can it be deleted? Or you may have a task that you would like to do one day, but it can be deferred or delayed to a later time. Don’t lose sight of this task by adding it to a focuser reserved for remote future planning. Meanwhile, delegate those tasks that can be done by someone else, preferably someone who can perform the task better than you could. Finally, whatever is left over, you do. These might be tasks that can be done in 10 minutes or less and just need to be completed, or they may be tasks of higher priority that need to be scheduled immediately.

These five recommendations are my professional resolutions for 2016. By focusing on planning, scheduling time for education and training, checking in with previously set goals, renewing the commitment to your file management system, and applying the 4 D’s of time management to any pending matters, you can reboot your system, so to speak. I invite you to join me in resolving to start the new year with a fresh beginning – professionally and personally. Happy New Year!

If you want to learn more about becoming a Lawyers With Purpose member and what we have to offer your estate or elder law practice, join us this Friday, January 22nd for a FREE webinar "How You Can Have the Business, the Income and the Life that You Once Dreamed About When You First Started Your Practice. Click here to grab your spot today.

By Sabrina A. Scott, Paralegal, The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC and Director of VA Services for Lawyers with Purpose.

Victoria L. Collier, Veteran of the United States Air Force, 1989-1995 and United States Army Reserves, 2001-2004. Victoria is a Certified Elder Law Attorney through the National Elder Law Foundation; Author of “47 Secret Veterans Benefits for Seniors”; Author of “Paying for Long Term Care: Financial Help for Wartime Veterans: The VA Aid & Attendance Benefit”; Founder of The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC; Co-Founder of Lawyers with Purpose; and Co-Founder of Veterans Advocate Group of America.

David-bowie-success-anxiety

What David Bowie Taught Us About Personal Care Plans

I was in 5th grade when I got my first ghetto blaster. It was pink and came from Santa wrapped up with a David Bowie cassette tape. I played “Dancing in the Street” on that ghetto blaster, danced around my room and stared at my David Bowie poster what seemed like a million times. He was an icon. His music masterfully took over MTV during the time period when MTV played music videos. He was able to paint the exact picture he desired his audiences to see. A talent he held even in death. David Bowie fought cancer for 18 months privately and died in his home, peacefully, surrounded by family. With the help of his wife, Iman, and children David died exactly as he lived … on his own terms.

David-bowie-success-anxietyAs soon as I read of the way that he passed, I instantly knew that David had a personal care plan. He decided exactly who he wanted around him at death. It has been reported that when he got too sick to go to his favorite pub for his favorite sandwiches, assistants would go pick them up for him. When facing a chronic disease, there is so little we can control, but isn’t it nice to know that we can plan to be as comfortable as possible, surrounded by the things and people we love and sheltered from those we do not want around.  

Personal care plans are an amazing, yet largely overlooked, estate planning tool. While having our finances in order is critical, knowing we will pass with the comforts and dignity we deserve can offer more assurance than any other portion of a well-made plan. Early in my career, I largely disregarded the personal care plan as an ancillary document not necessary. But, as I watched client after client pass in various ways under various circumstances, I saw over and over not only the comfort it brought to the ill party, but the guidance and assurance it brought to family members that they were honoring their loved one as he would have wanted.  

A well written personal care plan allows a client the ability to guide who visits during end stages of life. It guides the determination of when and in what condition the person wishes to be taken out in public. It allows a person to select what food, drinks, television shows, books and entertainment he wants available when he can no longer articulate such things. It lists religious preferences and whether or not one wishes to attend church services.

Personal care plans also offer the ability to appoint one’s own disability panel. This disability panel is a group of individuals in someone’s life who will decide when a person is incompetent for purposes of any trust in which his estate is held. What a power! Now this person has kept his life from going on display as a Judge who knows little about him determines his competence. Instead the decision is made by a hand selected group of loved, trusted people in a private manner.

On his 50th birthday, David Bowie stood in Madison Square Garden and said, “I don’t know where I’m going from here, but I promise it won’t be boring.” And, it wasn’t. He left us on top of the charts and under his own terms. As LWP attorneys, how great is it that we make sure our clients pass with the same dignity?  And we have everything we need to do it right at our fingertips within the drafting software…

If you aren't a Lawyers With Purpose member consider joining our FREE webinar "How You Can Have the Business, the Income and the Life that You Once Dreamed About When You First Started Your Practice" on Friday, January 22nd at 2:00 EST.  In just one hour we'll share with you lots of effective techniques – and you don’t want to miss any of them:

  • Streamline your practice, increase revenue, avoid malpractice – all while working fewer hours and enjoying more time to spend with your family and serving your community.
  • Create targeted marketing and sales efforts so your practice grows reliably, predictably, and CONSISTENTLY!
  • Build lasting relationships with referral sources and strategic partners – ensuring your clients stay loyal AND work on your behalf referring their friends over and over again!

All Designed With YOUR Practice And YOUR Success In Mind

Kimberly Brannon, Legal-Technical & Software, Lawyers With Purpose

Bigstock-Revoked-47094595

Revoking An Irrevocable Trust

Did you ever wonder if you can revoke an irrevocable trust? The bigger question is, why would you want to? Didn't the grantor set it up to ensure it's not revoked? All good questions, but you never know.

Many clients' biggest concern with creating irrevocable trusts is, “what if something happens” they never expected. As estate planning attorneys, we are able to calm client fears by expressing that an IPug® trust can permit them, as grantor, to retain rights to the income and continue for their life to continue all their assets and retain the complete authority to distribute the principal to anyone they choose at any time, other than themselves or their spouses (if Medicaid eligibility is a goal). Inevitably, there's always one client who worries they might need it.

A typical response is, they can distribute it to their kids and the kids can give it back. While this is true, it is not a foolproof planning strategy, as we cannot be assured that the children will actually give it to them in the manner the grantor so desired. More commonly, the need to revoke an irrevocable trust occurs if the client falls ill and needs long-term care prior to the five-year look-back period running. To “cure” the transfer to the irrevocable trust, one seeks to revoke the irrevocable trust in whole or in part, to ensure funds are given back to the grantor to pay through any penalty period caused by the transfer of assets that remain in the IPug. The question becomes, can you revoke an irrevocable trust?


Bigstock-Revoked-47094595The answer is, it depends on your state law. In most states, an irrevocable trust can be modified or revoked (completely or partially) if all of the parties consent. In an IPug trust, however, you do not need all of the parties to consent to modify the trust, as the grantor retains a non-generated power of appointment that allows the grantor the full rights to modify the trust beneficiaries in any way, shape or form, including the ability to modify the timing, manner and method of distribution to the beneficiaries. But one unbending restriction is that the grantor can never change the trust to give himself or herself access to the principal.

So who are considered the parties to the trust? Generally, the parties consist of the grantor, the trustee, and all of the beneficiaries. When drafting an irrevocable IPug trust, the grantor and trustee is traditionally the client. Therefore two out of the three can be accomplished with just the grantor. Further, getting consent of all of the beneficiaries traditionally includes the grantor, as they may be an income beneficiary during their life. The distinction then becomes, who else are the beneficiaries?

When considering those who are responsible to consent to a modification or revocation, one must look to the trust terms to determine if an individual is a present beneficiary, a residuary beneficiary, or a contingent beneficiary. Generally, most states require the consent of the present and residuary beneficiaries. Consent will not be required from any beneficiaries whose interest is not affected by the amendment or revocation. Some states, however, require even the consent of the contingent beneficiaries. Contingent beneficiaries are those who would receive the benefit from the trust if the present interest or residuary beneficiaries were not able to. Typically, this would be the children beneficiaries where a "per stirpes" distribution is provided for.

This can become very problematic if you need contingent beneficiaries’ consent, because most would be a minor and unable to consent. Then you would need to look to state law to see if a parent can consent on behalf of a child. In most states, since it's a property interest, parents do not automatically have the legal right to affect the property interests of their children, just guardianship over their “person.” The strategy with an IPug is to utilize the retained power of appointment to remove all beneficiaries except one, and then get that one named beneficiary to consent to the modification. After the modification is accomplished, the grantor can again modify the trust and rename all of the original beneficiaries if desired. Where it can get complicated is if any of the parties are deceased. Generally speaking, if a party is deceased, then the contingent beneficiaries would be required.

The bigger challenge is if the grantor is deceased. While a strong argument can be made that consent of the beneficiaries who ultimately benefit from the trust should be enough, it is very difficult to overcome a challenge that an irrevocable trust in the absence of the grantor who created it was meant to remain unchanged. It is presumed in the creation of the trust that the intentions of the grantor will be maintained in their absence. If you want to ensure that it can be modified after a grantor’s death or incompetence, your irrevocable trust should authorize a modification with the consent of the beneficiaries in the absence of the grantor by virtue of incompetency or death. You must, however, in all circumstances ensure that no modification can be made to permit the grantor to have access to the principle. Doing so would invalidate all of the protections originally sought by the irrevocable trust.

In a handful of states, consent of the parties is not sufficient to modify an irrevocable trust and consent from the court is required. This is a much more difficult approach, if for no other reason than the time it takes to get the court's consent, and the possible consequences or loss of assets caused by the delay. The cost by utilizing courts can be counter to the client's “protection” goal. That's obviously on a state by state and court by court basis. So if you're doing this planning, know your state's rules. The good news is that it is rare, if ever, that you need to revoke an IPug trust, and if you need to, it is quite simple to do by minimizing the beneficiaries through your power of appointment.

Don't miss THE estate and elder law event that is not to be missed this February 24th – 26th in Orlando, FL.  We only have 15 seats left and on-time registration ends tomorrow – Friday, January 8th at midnight!  Register now and let us show you how Lawyers With Purpose can make a difference for you and your team both personally and professionally.  Registration Link: http://retreat.lawyerswithpurpose.com/

David J. Zumpano, Esq, CPA, Co-founder Lawyers With Purpose, Founder and Senior Partner of Estate Planning Law Center