Bigstock-Apple-Iphone-With-Blank-Screen-29625881

In Defense of My Smartphone – By a Generation Xer

by with No Comment Team Building

On the second day of the Lawyers with Purpose Tri-Annual Practice Enhancement Retreat in Orlando, there was a focus session on the Infrastructure Track called “Bridging the Generation Gap,” presented by Susan Hunter. My presence there was mandatory, as I had been assigned to administrative duties as an employee of Lawyers with Purpose. However, it was also my treat, because I am a big fan of Susan’s presentations and knew I was in for an informative and humorous session – and I was right. Susan talked about the three generations that make up her law firm team: The Baby Boomers, Generation X, and the Millennials. She also explored the challenges and opportunities that may occur when working with someone not from your own generation, as well as the growth mindset needed to bridge this gap.

Bigstock-Apple-Iphone-With-Blank-Screen-29625881Among the various characteristics of the Millennials noted was their hyper-ease with technology, especially social media, predominantly via smartphones. It was cited that 98% of Millennials have a smartphone. And it is the smartphone that is usually blamed for promoting isolation and the decrease in face-to-face interactions in real time – not FaceTime. But, in defense of my smartphone, I found that I related more to the Millennials who work in our firm during this trip because of it than I think I would have otherwise. Don’t get me wrong, there was also plenty of good, old-fashioned team building in the form of conversations, brainstorming, card and board games, as well as one night with a home-cooked meal prepared by team members. However, I must confess that our smartphones did play an important part in bringing us together as a team.

My use – excuse me – our use of the smartphone during our road trip from Atlanta to Orlando as well as during the retreat was interactive. First and foremost, we used it to get information like researching recommended places to eat along I-75 or finding the cheapest gas when it was time to refuel. We also used the mapping capabilities of the smartphone extensively to direct us on our route, avoid traffic, and keep us up to date on our ETA despite the pit stops. Then there is what may be the default use of the smartphone: communication. Our firm stayed at a timeshare condo a few minutes from the hotel where the retreat occurred, and this required some coordination to accommodate the needs of all nine team members. We relied on text messages and calls to remain in contact and synchronize needed rides. During the road trip, we would also send regular text messages to Victoria, our supervisor, to give her status updates on our arrival both to Orlando and Atlanta.

Another way we communicated via smartphone was by sharing photos the team took. This included sharing funny pictures of Goofy and the team at the reception, but they also served to document our team’s work at the retreat, like the photo we shared of our completed, collaborative Brainstorming Sprints sheet. Lawyers with Purpose even provided a smartphone app called EventBoard for the retreat and the Practice with Purpose program. The app provides an interactive conference event guide with the schedule, speaker information, sponsors and their websites, floor plans, and online evaluation forms. I really like how the events grayed out on the schedule as the day went on so you could immediately see the highlighted current and upcoming sessions. Sure, there were technical difficulties. When I first opened the application, no details loaded for the sessions and the evaluation forms were blank. However, once I closed the other 20 apps that I was unconsciously, simultaneously running on my iPhone, EventBoard worked quite well.

I will confess that my first sight of some of the Millennials in our firm on any given morning during the retreat was in bed by the light of a smartphone furiously typing. Perhaps they were well on their way to the 50 or more text messages that 50% of Millennials surveyed will send in a day. But I can’t blame them, as the first thing I did every night and every morning while away was to text my family to say “Hi.”

Finally, we used our smartphones to play music enjoyed by the team as a whole. We took turns depending on who had a particular song we wanted to hear. No one had brought a portable speaker, and the van’s stereo system had no speakers in the passenger area, thus we had to improvise with one of those pairs of giant headphones that Millennials often sport to broadcast the music for all to hear. As a result, the music was a little tinny and not as loud as I would have liked. Nonetheless, it relieved the monotony of the road trip as we sang, hummed, and/or danced to music from all three generations and, more importantly I think, moved in harmony as a great team should.

If you want to learn more about Lawyers With Purpose and in particular what it takes to have a successful practice, click here and download our FREE eBook "The Five Essential Roles for A Successful Practice".  

Here Is Just Some of What We'll Reveal:

  • Discover the Five Key Roles that must be fulfilled to truly have a successful law firm.
  • What you need at all five levels.
  • How each role impacts the organization and its ability to perform.
  • How each role interacts to achieve ultimate success.
  • The bottom line of what you need to create a purposeful practice
  • … and so much more!

By Sabrina A. Scott, Paralegal, The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC and Director of VA Services for Lawyers With Purpose.

Victoria L. Collier, Veteran of the United States Air Force, 1989-1995 and United States Army Reserves, 2001-2004. Victoria is a Certified Elder Law Attorney through the National Elder Law Foundation; Author of “47 Secret Veterans Benefits for Seniors”; Author of “Paying for Long Term Care: Financial Help for Wartime Veterans: The VA Aid & Attendance Benefit”; Founder of The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC; Co-Founder of Lawyers with Purpose; and Co-Founder of Veterans Advocate Group of America.

Bigstock-Legal-Law-Rules-Community-Just-94090013

Utilizing the New LWP-CCS Personal Services Agreement

by with No Comment Estate Planning Drafting SoftwareLegal Technical

Personal service agreements, or personal care agreements, are typically agreements between a family member providing care and another needing care. These agreements act as a legal contract between the two parties regarding the range of care one party is providing to the other. As a Medicaid and/or VA planning tool, a personal service agreements may act as a method of spend-down while making sure your elderly client is provided the services needed and is appropriately compensating a family member who is making personal and professional sacrifices to provide the services.

We are excited to share that the LWP Client-Centered Software is now providing a comprehensive Personal Services Agreement that thoroughly addresses the many issues that Medicaid will consider when analyzing a care plan. The care plan also offers the language you will need if a client starts receiving VA benefits and plans to pay those to a child or family member to provide care.

Bigstock-Legal-Law-Rules-Community-Just-94090013First, the software incorporates all parties involved in the plan and requires that all parties sign the plan.

Medicaid wants to make sure that the compensation offered to the caregiver is reasonable in the area of the country where the services are provided. The LWPCCS incorporates the hourly rates of court-appointed guardians, geriatric-care professionals and general-service providers to justify the hourly rate paid to the caregiver. If you opt to do so, the software can calculate the hourly rate of the caregiver as the average of the rates provided for the professionals mentioned above.

Medicaid will want to know where the care is provided. This can be especially important if the child is moving in with the parent to provide care in lieu of nursing care, as they may later qualify for the child caregiver exemption. The software assumes the care is at the home of the person needing care. However, with the click of a button you can choose another place of care, be it in the child’s home, an assisted living facility, an independent living facility or a nursing home.

The terms of the agreement are an important part of creating a valid contract and meeting Medicaid requirements. The LWPCCS allows you to determine the start date of the agreement, the term of the agreement (lifetime, term of years or term of weeks), how often the caregiver will be paid, and the hourly rate the caregiver receives. Another important note: When the caregiver agreement is produced, it defines the caregiver’s role as that of a general contractor and eliminates any tax liability for the person receiving care, providing additional protections for your client.

The feature of the software that allows you to specify which activities of daily living (ADLs) the person needs assistance with can help with Medicaid guidelines and VA guidelines as well.

Finally, alternate caregivers are named for any time periods during which the caregiver is unable to perform the tasks, due to personal illness, vacation, other employment or any other reason.

You can find the new personal services agreement in the LWPCCS under the Medicaid Qualification folder, since we see it as a critical part of Medicaid planning. Incorporating the new LWP Personal Care Agreement into your practice is yet another layer of solid legal planning and documentation we provide for our clients as LWP attorneys.

If you want to learn more about adding medicaid to your estate or elder law practice register for our FREE WEBINAR "Simplifying Medicaid Eligibility & Qualified Transfers" on Tuesday, March 15th at 2 EST. Click here to reserve your spot now.

Here's just some of what you'll discover…

  • Understanding the 12 Key terms of Medicaid
  • Learn the Qualification Standards: Does Client Meet Needs Tests?
  • Learn the Medicaid Terms of Art
  • Learn the Snap Shot, Look Back/Look Forward Distinction: And how to put it all together
  • At the end of the event receive an ALL STATES Medicaid Planning Resource Guide
  • …and much, much more!

Just register here to reserve your seat… it's 100% FREE!

Kimberly M. Brannon, Esq., Legal-Technical & Software Trainer, Lawyers With Purpose

Legacy Stories

Values vs. Valuables

by with No Comment Estate Planning Drafting SoftwareSystems & Processes

A recent survey conducted by the Allianz Academy of Legacies asked Baby Boomers and their parents to rank priorities when leaving an inheritance.

Overwhelmingly, they preferred passing down their “values” vs. “valuables.”

Yet, only a small fraction of these generations has made provisions for this in their estate plans, mainly due to a lack of professional guidance and a practical legacy plan.

Legacy StoriesAs such, the demand for providing a values solution is expected to increase dramatically in the coming years, and estate planners are in the most advantageous position to benefit.

Not only do families find it difficult to get professional advice on this matter, but also the professionals they consult with have few options to offer – until now.

Over the past decade, the team at Legacy Stories has provided senior care professionals with a life review program that has become an industry standard. Now the methods and technology have been reformatted to serve the estate planning and financial advisor community.

To that end, the “Legacy Values Plan” is designed specifically to be a comprehensive self-guided legacy-building solution that can attract new clients and increase client retention with no added staff or training.

This award-winning solution helps your clients preserve and pass down their life lessons, values and experiences as an essential part of today’s estate plan.

Lawyers with Purpose has made arrangements to offer its members this exceptional program at 20% off.

To learn more go to: https://www.legacystories.org/values

Apply this code for the discount: LWP20

Tom Cormier, Co-founder, LegacyStories.org

Roslyn Drotar, Online Marketing, Content & Social Strategist for Lawyers With Purpose

Bigstock-Word-Veterans-and-stars-around-117350726

House Bill 4351: Going After Pension Poachers

by with 3 Comments Asset ProtectionLegal TechnicalVA

House Bill 4351 should be stopped!

For the past several years, bills have been introduced for Congressional approval that would impose a three-year look back, and penalties up to 10 years, for veterans and their spouses who give away their assets and then apply for a pension program designed for indigent wartime veterans. The bills were limited to addressing the concerns of deliberate impoverishment by veterans with the help of lawyers, financial advisors, and others. The bills never passed.


Bigstock-Word-Veterans-and-stars-around-117350726In January 2015, the Veterans Administration published proposed changes to the laws in the Federal Register that would change Title 38 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The VA included penalties for transfers of assets, and used very broad definitions of transfers (i.e. the purchase of an annuity), just like the previous bills that had been introduced. However, the VA went much further, proposing to (1) extend beyond its Congressional authority and (2) extend beyond the scope of the perceived needed changes.

Beyond VA Authority.

Under the pension program for wartime veterans, the claimant must meet an income and asset standard. With regard to income, the VA deducts from gross income all permissible medical expenses. Home healthcare is a permissible medical expense. But the VA proposed to limit the deduction to the average cost of home healthcare based on a national average set two years prior to the proposed changes, which would be $21 per hour. The law is clear that if a medical expense is deductible, then the entire amount must be deducted, and a change of this nature is in violation of the Congressional right.

Beyond the Scope

The purpose of the bills introduced into Congress and the purpose of the proposed changes to the VA regulations is to prevent people from divesting themselves of assets, which they otherwise could use for themselves to pay for care, in order to qualify for tax-free income from the VA to pay for their care. The VA exceeded the purpose of these bills when they included in the proposed changes a limitation on the lot coverage for veteran’s home place. The home place and a reasonable lot area have always been exempt by the VA when applying for pension. A reasonable lot area has always been defined as the same or similar in size to those in the same community or neighborhood. Rather than keeping the long-standing laws, the VA wants to count any property value that exceeds two acres. This makes no sense under the purpose of the law changes to keep people from divesting themselves of assets. First, a 900-square-foot condo in New York City may be worth well over $1,000,000, but it would be an exempt resource under the proposed changes. Whereas, a house sitting on five acres in south Georgia would be a countable resource, even if its value is only $150,000. Moreover, the veterans may have been living in the house for 10, 20, 30 years or more and had no intention of ever filing for the VA pension when they bought the house. Thus, the change in the law has nothing to do with the perceived abuses of people trying to save their assets and qualify for benefits.

Congress has apparently given up on trying to pass a bill that specifically details a look back and penalties for wartime veterans who give money away to qualify for the pension. After all, this is an election year and that would not look very good.

Nonetheless, a few members have found a sneaky way to get the VA’s proposed changes passed by Congress without Congress necessarily knowing what they are actually passing. House Resolution 4351, submitted in the House of Representatives on January 8, was sponsored by Rep. Matt Cartwright of Pennsylvania and co-sponsored by Rep. Sanford Bishop of Georgia, Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas and Rep. Walter Jones of North Carolina. It has been referred to the Committee on Veteran’s Affairs.

Its stated goal is “To protect individuals who are eligible for increased pension under laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on the basis of need of regular aid and attendance from dishonest, predatory, or otherwise unlawful practices, and for other purposes.” The act would be titled, “Veterans Care Financial Protection Act of 2016.”

This sounds really good, because Congress is professing to protect veterans from financial predators. Second, the act does nothing more than mandate that the secretary of the VA work with the heads of federal agencies, states, and such experts as the secretary considers appropriate to “develop and implement Federal and State standards to protect individuals from dishonest, predatory, or otherwise unlawful practices.” The VA would then have 180 days to submit the standards to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs of the Senate and of the House of Representatives. If this resolution passes, the VA can just hand over the proposed changes in the laws as the standards. The resolution does not say what the two committees are to do once they receive the standards from the VA.

The VA plans to finalize proposed changes (with modifications) by early summer. What is unclear is whether a passage of this “blind” resolution would immediately sanctify any changes the VA has made, or if the changes cannot take effect until after the two committees have taken some action of approval. What is clear is that advocates and veterans must once again push to make your political leaders, specifically those in the two Veterans’ Affairs committees, aware of these damaging changes that have no bearing on the purpose of the proposed changes – limiting home healthcare to an outdated national average and limiting the home place lot coverage to two acres instead of a reasonable lot for the area.

If you would like to know more about the VA Proposed 3 Year Lookback and Other Law Changes join our FREE WEBINAR on Wednesday, March 16th at 4EST. Click here to reserve your spot today.

Victoria L. Collier, Co-Founder, Lawyers with Purpose, LLC; Certified Elder Law Attorney through the National Elder Law Foundation; Fellow of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys; Founder and Managing Attorney of The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC; Co-Founder of Veterans Advocates Group of America; Entrepreneur; Author; and nationally renowned Presenter.

Bigstock-Who--4420521

Who Should Be Trustee?

by with No Comment Asset ProtectionDavid J. ZumpanoEstate Planning Drafting SoftwareLegal Technical

There's a constant battle between lawyers as to who should be trustee of an irrevocable asset protection trust. The primary school of thought is that it should never be the grantor, and some schools of thought believe it should never be the beneficiary. At Lawyers with Purpose, we disagree with both of those positions, but we recognize the concerns and rely on sound principles of asset protection law in making the final determinations.

Bigstock-Who--4420521Let's first discuss the question of whether the grantor should be trustee. Many practitioners believe that allowing the grantor to be trustee makes the assets of an irrevocable trust available to the grantor's creditors. Such a proposition is ludicrous. The challenge with most lawyers is that they do not allow the grantor to be trustee of his or her irrevocable trust. When pushed to explain why, they typically assume that's the way it was always done. Few dig further to see why it was done that way. So let's examine why grantors were not traditionally named trustee. The most adverse impact is that, if the grantor is trustee, they're deemed to retain enough control to have the assets of the trust included in their taxable estate when they die. For many generations, this was the death knell? of an asset protection trust. But in the last 15 years it's become irrelevant because of the rise of the estate tax exemption. Today only two in a thousand Americans have a taxable estate, so preventing the grantor from being trustee because of a potential inclusion of the trust asset in the estate of the grantor is not relevant to 99.8 percent of Americans. So why hold them to that standard?

The next major argument is a theory that if the grantor has control of the trust, then he could direct it back to himself. Well, that depends. What does the trust say? If the trust says that the grantor is not a beneficiary, or similarly the grantor is not a principal beneficiary but is entitled to the income, does that mean that the grantor as trustee all of a sudden gains a super power to violate the terms of the trust and give himself the principal when it's not allowed for? Hardly. In fact, there is consistent case law throughout all of the states, including cases that lead all the way up to the Supreme Court, that supports the notion that a grantor as trustee has all of the same fiduciary obligations as any other trustee and by no means has authority to act outside the powers granted to trustee. I specifically refer you to my Law Review article, "The Irrevocable Pure Grantor Trust: The Estate Planning Landscape Has Changed" in the Syracuse Law Review. In this article, I go through in‑depth review of all of the case law nationwide, and I'm excited to say that it is sound law that a grantor can be a trustee without risking the assets to the creditors of the grantor. One caveat, however, is if the grantor does retain the right to the income, then absolutely the income will be available to the creditors of the grantor.

So are there circumstances when the grantor as trustee's trust is invaded? Absolutely, but in every single case the invasion was not due to the grantor being the trustee, but rather was due to the pattern of behavior by a grantor trustee who violated regularly the terms of the trust in favor of themselves, and the trust was thereafter deemed a sham. In such cases, I concur with any court that makes that decision based on people who try to defraud the system. Irrevocable trusts must be managed in an arm's length manner, and as lawyers we do not plan for someone to become fraudulent. They are fraudulent to their own peril. But a properly drawn trust when the trustee is the grantor in no way, shape or form creates any risk of loss of asset protection if the terms of the trust are followed, as they are required to be in every case whether the grantor is trustee or not.

So at Lawyers with Purpose we encourage our members to do good legal work based on sound law, not fear, conjecture or because that's the way it's always been done. In the end, the client wins. It is silly to deny thousands of clients that we serve the ability to manage and control their own assets for the benefit of their families, just because some rogue case in some rogue state from some vile fact pattern allowed the court to invade against the intentions of the grantor. Protect your clients. Teach your clients. Share with your clients how these work. They are very safe and a great planning tool.

If you want to learn more about Lawyers With Purpose you can find all the information about becoming a member by clicking here to download our Membership Brochure.

David J. Zumpano, Esq, CPA, Co-founder Lawyers With Purpose, Founder and Senior Partner of Estate Planning Law Center

Bigstock-Forms-Concept-with-Word-on-Fol-95979155

VA form 21-8049 – Request for Details of Expenses

by with No Comment Estate Planning Drafting SoftwareLegal TechnicalVA

For all you high Fact-finder/Follow through Kolbe types, don’t panic if the VA form 21-8049 number means nothing to you. It shouldn’t necessarily. If you file non-service-connected pension claims with the VA, you may never have had occasion to use this form, which is formally called a “Request for Details of Expenses.” It is not generally part of what Lawyers with Purpose considers a fully developed VA claim, although there are those who routinely include this form with all their VA claims.

Bigstock-Forms-Concept-with-Word-on-Fol-95979155Purpose of the 21-8049

As the name of VA form 21-8049 suggests, its main purpose is to report monthly non-medical expenses as well as expenses of dependents that otherwise are not typically reported on any other forms one submits with a fully-developed claim. The 21-8049 is usually sent to a claimant to be completed when the VA requires further information after the formal claim is filed. In fact, the VA specifically states in the instructions at the top, “We need additional information to determine whether you are entitled to benefits.” The VA may request this additional information because the adjudication manual directs the adjudicator to determine “whether or not the claimant’s financial resources are sufficient to meet his/her basic needs without assistance from VA. If a claimant’s assets are large enough that the claimant could use these assets to pay living expenses for a reasonable period of time, net worth is considered a bar,” M21-1 Adjudication Procedures Manual, Part V, Subpart I, Chapter 3, Section A.1.e. The 21-8049 may not be requested for every claim you file, but if it is requested, it can delay the claim process. For that reason, some choose to include this form with every formal claim they file. Or, you may decide to complete this form only when your claimant has unusually high non-medical living expenses that you want to make evident to the VA.

How to complete the 21-8049

The current version of this form is dated Aug 2007 in the lower left corner of the first page, although the VA still accepts older versions. It is a two-page form that consists of seven sections. The instructions are minimal, but the VA does provide a toll-free number to call for assistance. Like any other VA form, it is recommended that you complete every section. Non-applicable sections should be crossed out, or you should otherwise indicate that these do not apply. Sections I and II are for listing dependents – both those living with the claimant and those not living with the claimant. Furthermore, you can specify the amount, if any, that the claimant contributes to the support of dependents not living with the claimant so that the VA will consider these amounts when evaluating whether the claimant’s net worth is sufficient.

Sections III, IV, V, and VI are for “Monthly Expenses (except medical) for you and those listed above as living with you,” “Hospital and Medical Expenses,” “Educational Expenses,” and “Expenses of Last Illness and Burial of Veteran, Spouse, or Child and Just Debts of Deceased Veteran or Parent’s Spouse,” respectively. The completion of these four sections is fairly straightforward, but a few remarks should be made to avoid potential problems. Section III lists several possible monthly expenses, like Housing, Food, Taxes, etc., and it also provides blanks for inserting other types of expenses, but this section is only for reporting non-medical expenses. For example, the line item “Housing” should not be used for reporting fees for a nursing home or assisted living facility. Instead, total medical expenses that were reported on the VA form 21P-8416 “Medical Expense Report” with the formal claim should be reported in Section IV, “Hospital and Medical Expenses,” along with a brief breakdown of the medical expenses, or simply refer the VA to the already submitted form 21P-8416. Finally, section VII is for reporting “Commercial Life Insurance Payments” to the claimant. While life insurance payouts are not considered income by the VA if the insured was a veteran, these will be considered as part of net worth and could potentially put a claimant over the asset limit unless you can document to the VA that these assets have been spent down.

What to file with the 21-8049

Documentation of the expenses listed on this form is not required but may assist in your claim. If you decide you want to start including the 21-8049 with all your formal claims, you may decide not to include further supporting documentation unless later requested by the VA. If you do refer to the VA form 21P-8416 in Section IV, you may want at least to include a copy of this form for the adjudicator’s convenience. However, if the VA sent you the form 21-8049 to be completed, they may have requested other information as well. In such cases, ensure that you submit the VA form 21-8049 with anything else requested in the VA correspondence, and that you respond by any deadlines the VA may specify.

If you want to lear more about the Veterans Administration Proposed 3 Year Lookback and Other Law Changes join our FREE WEBINAR on Wednesday, March 16th at 4 EST. Just click here to reserve your spot.  Here's what you'll get:

Discover the Nuts and Bolts of the Proposed VA Changes…and What it Means for Your Practice!

On Friday, January 23, 2015, the Veterans Administration proposed changes in the Federal Register that would…

  • Impose a three year lookback for transfers of assets, including gifts to persons, trusts, or purchases of annuities.
  • Deny claims for up to 10 years due to transfers.
  • And exempt only the home and two acres from net worth. If a claimant's property exceeds two acres, it will count toward the net worth figure for eligibility.

By Sabrina A. Scott, Paralegal, The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC and Director of VA Services for Lawyers With Purpose.

Victoria L. Collier, Veteran of the United States Air Force, 1989-1995 and United States Army Reserves, 2001-2004. Victoria is a Certified Elder Law Attorney through the National Elder Law Foundation; Author of “47 Secret Veterans Benefits for Seniors”; Author of “Paying for Long Term Care: Financial Help for Wartime Veterans: The VA Aid & Attendance Benefit”; Founder of The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC; Co-Founder of Lawyers with Purpose; and Co-Founder of Veterans Advocate Group of America.

Bigstock-Forms-Concept-with-Word-on-Fol-95979155

Tips For VA form 21-0779

by with No Comment Estate Planning Drafting SoftwareSystems & ProcessesVA

Purpose of the 21-0779

The VA form 21-0779 “Request for Nursing Home Information In Connection With Claim for Aid and Attendance” is used only for certain non-service-connected pension claims, and its primary purpose is to document the level of care required by a claimant or a claimant’s dependent. The VA form 21-0779 is completed specifically for individuals who are residents of nursing homes. The importance of documenting this level of care is twofold:

  1. To support a claim for additional pension above and beyond the base level;
  2. To support the need for certain medical expenses.

There are three levels of non-service-connected pension that a claimant may qualify for: Base pension, Housebound, and Aid & Attendance. The base pension is the lowest pension that a claimant may be awarded. Additional funds are granted if you can document that the claimant is housebound, and even more funds go to those requiring another individual to assist with at least two activities of daily living, or ADLs. The VA also looks at level of care when considering medical expenses to offset income. Therefore, the VA form 21-0779 should document the level of care that justifies the medical expenses being declared. This applies to the claimant’s dependents as much as to the claimant. So for example, the VA will not consider the nursing home facility expense for a veteran’s spouse unless a form 21-0779 is completed for the spouse indicating the need for this level of care.

Bigstock-Forms-Concept-with-Word-on-Fol-95979155Completing the 21-0779

The VA form 21-0779 is just a single page and is mainly to be completed by a third party; that is, the nursing home. All you need to complete the form is the veteran’s – or claimant’s, if other than the veteran – name(s), and Social Security number(s). When you are completing this form for a living veteran’s spouse or other dependent, that person’s name appears in the field that requests the name of the claimant, even though, strictly speaking, the claimant is the living veteran. When downloaded from the VA website at http://www.va.gov/vaforms/, the 21-0779 has no separate instruction pages. The form is fairly straightforward to fill out, but it still provides a toll-free phone number for those who require assistance completing the form. Despite the fact that you are not completing this form yourself for the most part, you should still review all 21-0779s once completed by the nursing home and before submitting to the VA so that you can confirm that every field is answered.

What to file with the 21-0779

Nothing in particular is required to be filed with the 21-0779 form. If you determine that you do need to file this form, it should be submitted as part of a fully developed claim in order to expedite the processing. If you are filing the VA form 21-0779 with your formal claim, then you do not need to file a VA form 21-2680 “Examination for Housebound Status or Permanent Need for Regular Aid and Attendance” because the former documents that the claimant is in a nursing home and requires skilled nursing care and thus by definition has a permanent need for regular aid and attendance. This will, however, not stop some VA adjudicators from requesting the 21-2680 form in addition to the VA form 21-0779, thus we generally request all our VA clients to get a VA form 21-2680 completed as soon as they have retained us.

Always remember that this form can be used for supporting both a claim for a higher level of pension and the need for certain medical expenses. Keep those two purposes in mind when you are deciding whether or not it needs to be included as part of your VA claim, and when reviewing its completion by the nursing home to make sure there are not unexpected results with your claim.

If you're interested in learning more about the Lawyers With Purpose Cloud Based Workflow System join us on Friday, February 26th at 2EST.  Finally…an AUTOMATED law firm system for Estate and Elder Law Attorneys designed to free up your time and get the work out the door quickly and easily!  Click here to reserve your spot for this FREE LIVE DEMO!  We only have a few spots left so grab your seat today!

By Sabrina A. Scott, Paralegal, The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC and Director of VA Services for Lawyers With Purpose.

Victoria L. Collier, Veteran of the United States Air Force, 1989-1995 and United States Army Reserves, 2001-2004. Victoria is a Certified Elder Law Attorney through the National Elder Law Foundation; Author of “47 Secret Veterans Benefits for Seniors”; Author of “Paying for Long Term Care: Financial Help for Wartime Veterans: The VA Aid & Attendance Benefit”; Founder of The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC; Co-Founder of Lawyers with Purpose; and Co-Founder of Veterans Advocate Group of America.

Bigstock-Grey-pixel-mosaic-design-backg-107626922

Do You Employ The “Fifty Shades of Grey” Publicist?

by with No Comment Systems & Processes

E L James is the author of the extremely popular erotic romance trilogy "Fifty Shades of Grey," released in May of 2011 and followed by the movie of the same title on February 13, 2015. This was the author's first novel, but she clearly hit a home run!

Maybe that is where I had my misconnect. I write poetry, some of which is provocative. Believing the new release of the movie would be a great opportunity to connect two pieces of art, I sent a letter via email to Ms. James’ publicist, which included three topic-appropriate poems. Yes, it was gutsy and a stretch, but history is not made by watching other people take action (and neither is money).

Bigstock-Grey-pixel-mosaic-design-backg-107626922It has been a year and I have not heard from Ms. James or her publicist – not even a "We are not interested." It makes me wonder if Ms. James ever even got my letter, or if her publicist independently discarded it without discussion.

When are referrals or opportunities sent to you that you are not aware of? Often.

Just to share a few in my law office I, much too late, learned of:

  1. A resume for an administrative position received by a paralegal and discarded without bringing it to me.
  2. A referral, from a good friend, that wouldn't follow our office procedures and requested a free consult without first attending a workshop. Discarded.
  3. An offer to make a presentation to a nursing home.

Would I have accepted any of the above opportunities? Maybe, but now I have no choice.

  1. I was in fact hiring at the time the resume was discarded.
  2. I would have done pro bono consult to help a colleague.
  3. I would move mountains to get in front of a nursing home administrator.

So why were they discarded? Why was my opinion trumped?

Because of one of two reasons, or both.

  1. Employees who believe they know a) what is best for you or the firm, or b) what you would have said and didn't want to bother you. These are rogue employees in the guise of being independent and efficient.

OR

  1. You haven't been clear on your expectations. A system should be in place for each member of the firm to report opportunities of ALL kinds presented, accepted and rejected. An opportunity in this sense should be defined as "a request of some sort by another person or organization to either the firm or the managing lawyer."

I appreciate efficiency and independence, but I appreciate opportunity even more. The owner or manager of the firm should have the final say to accept or deny.

I feel certain that, had Ms. James been presented with my letter and poetry, she would have taken one of two actions:

  1. Remembered her beginnings and reached out to assist a sister in the arts.

OR

  1. Sent a reply politely denying my request.

Don't your prospects and professional community deserve the same?

What are you missing? What processes can you implement to catch them? What can you do to gently discard the others without leaving them hanging?

Did you know that Lawyers With Purpose has it's own Cloud Based Workflow System specifically for estate and elder law firms?  If you want to learn more about it, join us on Friday, February 26th at 2EST for a FREE live demo! Just click here to reserve your spot now.

Victoria L. Collier, Co-Founder, Lawyers with Purpose, LLC, Certified Elder Law Attorney through the National Elder Law Foundation; Fellow of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys; Founder and Managing Attorney of The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC; Co-Founder of Veterans Advocates Group of America; Entrepreneur; Author; and nationally renowned Presenter.

Jaloza and Team

Congratulations to Andrew Jaloza, Lawyers With Purpose Member of The Month

by with No Comment Systems & ProcessesTeam Building

What is the greatest success you’ve had since joining LWP?  

The greatest success is having created a thriving Estate Planning Practice run by a cohesive team of dedicated people who are passionate about helping as many families as we possibly can.

Jaloza and TeamWhat is your favorite LWP tool?

It is not just the tools but the total client centered systematic approach of the LWP process that has allowed us to quickly go from zero to hero as an Elder Law and Estate Planning firm. 

How has being part of LWP impacted your team and your practice?

We have been impacted by our implementation coach Roz Drotar and our mentor Coach Candace Pollock, both of whom have held us accountable and challenged us to reach our highest possible potential while imparting their years of experience-based suggestions to help us achieve amazing growth over the past year.

Share something about yourself that most people don’t know about you.

Something that people don't know about me is that I am transparent. What you see is truly what you get. 

What is your favorite book and how did it impact your life?

My favorite book is called Man's Search of Meaning by Viktor Frankl. This book has impacted my life because after reading it, it has taught me that everything in your life is a matter of perspective, and how you look at something creates your world.