Lawyers with Purpose is getting ready for some exciting changes in our legal technical training. Over the past several months, as my calendar has been freed up to provide one-on-one legal training and file reviews with members, case-specific questions for the Live Case Study review have slowly faded. As such, we are restructuring the Monday afternoon hour to continue to provide members with the most efficient use of your time and the time of your staff. Moving forward, while we will continue to address all questions that are submitted by 5 p.m. Friday on the following Monday, we will be using a large portion of the legal technical hour as an in-depth study of the Lawyers with Purpose system and the many uses of the LWP Client Centered Software.
Members! Join Our Marketing Roundtable On Local Search With Nifty Law!
It’s not easy for a person to find the right lawyer, in the right town. With today’s clients turning straight to the Internet to find that one unique lawyer in their local area, marketing your practice can feel like trying to break the Enigma Code.
Join us on Thursday, June 9th at 4 EST along with Mike Ramsey of Nifty Law to learn the nuts and bolts expert tips about directory listing, search engine dos and don'ts, paid online advertising – getting links, likes and shares.
For anyone looking to unlock the mysteries and getting found on the Internet.
This is a members only event.
Register today: https://attendee.gotowebinar.com/register/1139857481701604100
The Longest Day
I was young when Granny T died. Granny T loved grilled cheese sandwiches, she loved porch swings, and she gave us grandkids MadLibs at Christmas. Granny T told me one time that she was the valedictorian of her high school class and that I was smart, just like her. Granny T had issues with her brain that were largely misdiagnosed and improperly treated. The night she died, the nursing home called and told my mother to come right away. She left immediately. She and her two sisters drove the hours it took to get to Granny as quickly as any child would after getting such a call.
But Granny T died alone in the nursing home at 66 years of age. None of her daughters made it to her in time. She was too far away from her family in a nursing home assigned by the state under the Medicaid program. It was one of the few times in life I saw my mother truly sad and broken.
My MeeMaw is still alive. She is 94. I introduced her to Taco Bell and the Gap, and she taught me the joy of soap operas and clipping coupons. MeeMaw regularly mailed me the most delicious homemade blackberry jelly when I was in college, much to the delight of all of my friends and dorm mates. MeeMaw always wrote notes with the jelly telling me that I could do anything that I put my mind to and that she was so proud to have a granddaughter with such a fine education. MeeMaw has diagnosed dementia, for which she is monitored by a geriatric physician. She forgets our names, she forgets we came to see her just minutes after we leave, and leaving her home environment is so disheveling and confusing for her that we don’t take her out any more.
There is no cure for dementia. MeeMaw will die from the physical ailments that come with it. She will likely pass not remembering where she is or how she got there. But MeeMaw is comfortable, clean, and close to her family. She lives in a lovely assisted living, afforded through proper early planning, not far from any of her three children, four grandchildren and eight great grandchildren. She will pass having led a much fuller life than Granny T, our memories of her will be stronger, and we will all make it there when the time comes.
Now you know my purpose story. It is the story of why I have practiced in Elder Law for 13 years. It is why I love helping attorneys across the country, through the best program on the market, to provide the most comfort possible to families in very difficult times. It is also why I am passionate and committed as an advocate and ambassador for the National Alzheimer’s Association. And, it is why I would like to ask each of you as legal advocates for those who suffer from Alzheimer’s and dementia to join the Lawyers with Purpose team in the fight to find a cure. June 20, 2016 is the summer solstice and the longest day of the year. We will honor those family members, friends and clients who have joined us for planned events at the Practice With Purpose retreat and at firms across the country. We ask that each of you consider joining our team, either in person or virtually, as the LWP elder law community shows our support of our personal communities.
We hope you, and your firm, may join our team during the Tri-Annual Practice Enhancement Retreat on June 20th. We'll be participating live from the event, and hope you can join us, if not, please join our group virtually at http://act.alz.org/site/TR?fr_id=8480&pg=team&team_id=327995. Throw on your purple shirt, send us pictures to post – and help raise awareness!
If you haven't registered for the Tri-Annual Practice Enhancement Retreat, grab your seat before early bird pricing ends May 13th: http://retreat.lawyerswithpurpose.com/
Together we can help find a cure and improve the lives of millions of families.
Kimberly M. Brannon, Esq., Legal Technical & Software Trainer for Lawyers With Purpose
The Medicaid Millionaire: Myth or Reality?
As the Lawyers with Purpose attorney trainer, I am often asked by transitioning attorneys or new members how I can justify helping people shelter money so that they could possibly one day receive Medicaid benefits, while still having funds available in trust. I often think as I respond, how could you not?
The Medicaid program was established in 1965. The original purpose of the program was to provide needed care for the indigent. In a 2011 House hearing on “Abuses of Medicaid Eligibility Rules,” Rep. Trey Gowdy argued that the extremely wealthy should not be on Medicaid. Medicaid is a program to alleviate impoverishment, so certainly this argument makes sense. One thing both Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton have in common is that neither should be in our offices asking how to get Medicaid benefits for long-term care.
But Rep. Gowdy went a step further, stating that “Income and asset tests are easy to circumvent and abuse. In fact, a cottage industry has arisen seeking to educate the wealthy on how to transfer or hide assets so taxpayers can pay for their long-term care.” When I read Mr. Gowdy’s quote, certainly I was not shocked. We, as a “cottage industry” of elder care attorneys, have already been pinned “pension poachers” by the Department of Veteran’s Affairs. So, it is not a stretch to hear that we are also being labeled in this way, even though we never break or abuse a law and certainly never ask our clients to do so.
I would like to ask Mr. Gowdy, and all of those who paint us with the broad brush stroke of system abusers, if they actually have any idea who our typical clients are. I suspect that they do not. Because the reality is that very few multi-millionaires come into our offices seeking Medicaid benefits. No, they come in for tax planning, they come in for asset protection and they come in for family trust planning. The people who come through our doors because a spouse has just entered the nursing home and they have been asked to deplete their $250,000 in savings to pay $8,000 a month for care are not these “millionaires.” They are the hard-working, tax-paying middle class. And they are frightened, they are nervous and they know that they are quickly becoming the indigent.
Currently, long-term care beneficiaries represent about 7 percent of the Medicaid recipient population. However, they absorb about 19 percent of the Medicaid funds. Why? Because long-term care is astronomically expensive and there is no other public program available to help with the expense. It is also believed that the average pre-plan for couples who plan over five years prior to institutionalization is saving the married client between $240,000 and $750,000. These numbers decrease by over half when we look at crisis cases. When asking why they pre-planned for Medicaid eligibility, below are the answers I received from former clients.
From a former school teacher married to a Vietnam veteran: “My husband has dementia. He could be sick for a long time and I am only 68 years old.”
From a widow with an adult disabled child in her home: “My daughter has special needs and is wheelchair-bound and I need to have the money left over to care for her for the rest of her life.”
From a retired doctor and his wife, a teacher: “I paid taxes all my life and I continue to pay all that is required of me. I also donate time and money to those in need. My children work hard and I do not want to be a burden on them.”
From an auto mechanic with Parkinson’s and his wife, a retired bus driver: “My neighbor lost everything they worked for. I don’t want to die having lost everything I worked for my wife to have when she is alone.”
It is also worth noting that the “Abuses of Medicaid Eligibility Rules” hearing never grew into any proposed law changes. This is most likely because the officials from the state Medicaid agencies and the nursing care industry who were brought in to speak before the committee painted a completely different portrait of the “system abusers.” They told the stories that they see every day. They spoke of the middle class – scared, desperate, and struggling to pay for care – and the attorneys who help them manage the legalities of a complex system. They spoke of the reality, not the myth.
If you haven't registered for the June Tri-Annual Practice Enhancement Retreat we're filling up fast and Early Bird pricing expires soon! Don't miss THE estate and elder law event not to be missed! Click here to register now and reserve your spot!
Kimberly M. Brannon, Esq., Legal Technical & Software Trainer – Lawyers With Purpose
Dig, if you WILL … the truth about Prince’s estate
Doves do not cry. Crying as an expression of pain or emotion is a mammalian trait. I know this to be true because on a 6th grade trip to the zoo, dressed in my finest purple, I asked the zoologist. So I am confident in stating that if you owned a raspberry beret and spent any portion of 1986 walking into the grocery store through the out door, you understand the depths of my mourning for the death of Prince.
As a closet follower of all things pop culture, I have listened repeatedly to my Prince playlist and read every article I have run across about Prince since his death. And then, today, it happened. I read an article so blatantly ridiculous, it could not possibly be true. Who would write such an atrocious, fabricated tale, and who would believe it? Turns out the top celebrity magazine in the country wrote it, and based on the 396 comments I saw, everyone believed it. The article has since been edited. Experts in the area have been interviewed and the magazine has fixed its egregious errors. Most likely these errors were discovered when their own attorneys almost fell out of their chairs, as I did. So, I promise that I will not trouble you with the hideous nature of the original article or the depression that sank further into my soul as I browsed reader comments saying they were going to contact their police stations on the subject. I will simply tell you the title of the article, which will provide you with all of the outrage and confusion you need for the day.
Who Will Get Prince’s Millions? Cops Say They Have No Record of a Will for the Late Singer.
Just let that sink in. As promised I will not regale you with the quotes from the original article saying that if no will is filed soon, the property of the singer who died a few days ago may be divided equally between his siblings. I will not bore you with the notion that the word TRUST was in the original article zero times. I will not tell you how the original article relied on police officers for all quotes related to probate administration. (Of course, they did not use that phrase.)
I will simply say this: We have no idea what will happen with Prince's estate. However, this article and hundreds of others like it do send a clear message that people are being miseducated and misinformed about estate planning and administration by the media.
As elder care attorneys, we need to take seriously this article and the hundreds of comments from readers believing everything they read. Our baby boomers are reaching the age of health issues, and every family is one accident away from a crisis situation. It is our duty to continue to educate our communities through workshops on the truths about wills, trusts and administration. Understanding the importance of protecting their assets for themselves and their children is a duty LWP attorneys have to our communities, and I am proud that we do not take that lightly.
And, if you are an elder care attorney, I encourage you continue the workshops you provide to your community giving the tools and knowledge necessary to help make educated decisions about family affairs. And, providing options to attendees will potentially save thousands of dollars when crisis strikes or old age rears its ugly head.
Let us, as the LWP community working together with our clients, not give up on our goal of educating and providing the best legal advice out there for families. Let us not give up – until the doves cry.
Early Bird registration and pricing is now open for the June 20th – 24th Tri-Annual Practice Enhancement Retreat in San Diego. During the week you'll discover our most effective and PROVEN practice growth strategies, legal/technical best practices and marketing GOLD – so powerful and cutting edge we will ONLY share them face-to-face! Register today and reserve your seat at early bird pricing!
Kimberly M. Brannon, Esq., Legal-Technical and Software Trainer
Trust Funding Essentials
We as attorneys, and sometimes even our clients, hear so much about trust funding, but rarely is it truly understood. I would like to outline a few essentials when doing trust funding to ensure that the underlying estate plan works as intended.
The first key step in any trust funding strategy is to identify what type of estate plan the client is pursuing. A traditional revocable living trust is an estate plan wherein the client identifies who gets to benefit from the client's assets when the client is well, disabled, and after death. A critically important point to funding a revocable living trust is if all assets funded in the trust are still 100 percent available to creditors, predators, and long-term care costs of the grantor while alive. The assets can continue to be made available to the creditors and predators of the beneficiary after the death of the grantor without proper planning (more on that later). In the alternative, if a client has opted to do an irrevocable trust for asset protection and/or current or future benefits eligibility (we call these IPUG® trusts) then funding is much more important, because assets are not protected from third-party predators until funded, and they're not protected from long-term care costs until funded and any related penalty period for the conveyance of the trust has expired.
Therefore, funding in asset protection or benefits eligibility is significantly different. Finally, if the client has done a trust predominantly for estate tax planning to ensure that assets are not included in the grantor's taxable estate, or to minimize the taxes on them, funding takes on yet another unique importance. Finally, regardless of what type of planning, we also need to look at the types of assets we are funding. For example, funding a home has several options as well as funding an IRA or other tax-qualified assets. So examine the differences and determine how to fund properly.
The first questions we must ask are, what type of planning has the client done and what type of assets is the client funding? If a client has done a revocable living trust, then funding is important to ensure that the trustee actually has the authority over the client's assets to administer them in the manner that has been identified by the client in the trust. If funding is not completed or properly done, a "pow will" usually cleans up any missed items at death by ensuring that any assets not funded that go through probate name the trust as beneficiary. Unfortunately, if the client doesn’t die but instead becomes incapacitated, failure to fund a revocable trust has more dire consequences. In addition, failure to fund assets to the trust does not eliminate probate, one of the primary benefits of having a revocable living trust to ensure the plan is carried out without the excess costs, delays and frustrations of probate to the client’s family.
In stark contrast to revocable trust planning, when planning for asset protection or benefits eligibility, funding becomes the most critical element to which all protection occurs. For example, if an asset is funded into an irrevocable asset protection trust today, it is protected from any and all claims that arise after the funding. More definitive, if planning for benefits eligibility, the funding of the last asset becomes most critical, as all assets funded to a trust will be subject to Medicaid's review of that transfer for up to 60 months. At Lawyers with Purpose, we call this the "look forward™" period. When funding an irrevocable trust for benefits planning, the look forward on the final conveyed assets will trigger protection of the assets. For example, if a client has $500,000 to fund and only funds $450,000 of it, and two years later remembers to finally fund the last $50,000, the $450,000 conveyed initially will have a 60‑month look forward, but the $50,000 conveyed two years later will have its own separate 60-month look forward that will extend years beyond the expiration of the previous trust transfer. That is why it's essential when benefits eligibility planning that funding be done in a timely and effective manner to ensure that the look forward is minimized.
For estate tax planning, obviously the funding of assets becomes critical by use of the Crummey power if life insurance or any gift-discounting techniques are being used, since the funding must be used to pay the insurance premium and must specifically relate to any special valuations that are obtained at the time of funding.
Although funding is a critical element in each type of planning, what can complicate it further is the type of assets being funded. For example, let's consider funding a home. For a typical revocable living trust, the funding of the home ensures that there will be no probate on the home but still makes the home available to creditors (if not protected by some other state statute while tenancy by the entirety), or it can become a recoverable asset after death if Medicaid benefits are received. While the home is exempt for married and single applicants, it can be subject to estate recovery after death for all funds paid on behalf of the applicant during their lifetime. See my related article on Estate Recovery - What Can (And Can't) They Get. Finally, a recent case in Massachusetts suggests that having a trust that allows the grantor to reside in the house makes the entire value of the house an available resource in determining the client's eligibility for benefits. See my post on Nadeau v. Thorne – No Reason To Fear. This adds additional complications in funding, since attorneys may now choose to reserve a life estate in the deed rather than fund the entire property to the trust and risk its loss as an available resource. Finally, transferring a house or second home to a qualified personal residence trust is a gift-discounting technique often utilized by those subject to estate tax. Again, the funding of these properties into the trust, and the subsequent survival of the grantor during the term in which the interest is held, is essential to maximize the estate tax reduction.
The other major asset to be considered in funding is the IRA. The Supreme Court in Clark v. Rameker decided in June 2014 that IRAs are not protected for those who inherit them. There is an obvious exception for an IRA that names a spouse beneficiary, who then combines it with an existing IRA. While this ensures IRA protection from general creditors, an IRA is not exempt in determining one's eligibility for Medicaid, and therefore, leaving an IRA to a spouse can expose the entire IRA balance to the surviving spouse's nursing home costs. Federal Medicaid laws are absolute: an IRA is an available resource, unless it is annuitized. Although some states have liberalized the interpretation of annuitization (i.e. many states deem they were payouts of RMD to satisfy the annuity executor) it is not the federal law, but merely state policy, which could be changed at any time without notice. Over the last few years, several states have changed their policy, thus making assets that were presumed to have been protected immediately available for long-term care costs.
The naming of a beneficiary of an IRA and other qualified or beneficiary designated accounts to the trust is now essential to maintain the asset protection intended. For example, even for a young couple with no assets, a $250,000 life insurance policy that pays to the spouse at death could be a catastrophe, as young people often get remarried or make unwise decisions. One should be cautious and ensure that all or part of a life insurance policy for a young couple names a separate share trust under a will for the benefit of the minor children, so as to ensure that the surviving spouse does not squander the proceeds, and that they are used as intended by the client. Finally, as we look at trust funding, it is essential to have a key system in place to ensure that your funding is done in a timely and appropriate manner. How assets are funded, the timing of assets funding, and the beneficiary designation utilized in funding for after death, are essential to ensure that the underlying goals of the client are achieved.
To have learn more about the support and systems to fund clients' plans properly, contact Lawyers with Purpose now. If you want to learn more about who we are consider joining our FREE webinar this Thursday, April 21st. Discover how to build a thriving Estate, Elder and Asset Protection practice that attracts higher quality clients, generates an endless supply of referrals and continuous exposure in the community … without working 80 hours a week or breaking the bank! Reserve your spot today, just click here now.
David J. Zumpano, Co-founder – Lawyers With Purpose
Crime Bill Introduced to Protect Veterans
Congressmen Tom Rooney (R-FL) and Ted Deutch (D-FL) introduced the “Preventing Crimes Against Veterans Act of 2016” on March 2. Rooney, an Army veteran, is a member of the House Appropriations Subcommittee on Veterans Affairs.
Rep. Rooney asserts that veterans in his district have brought to his attention that individuals are promising to expedite veterans’ claims through the horrendously backlogged system. After charging an exorbitant fee, the individual can no longer be found. Rooney has not stated whether these individuals are accredited by the Veterans Administration or not.
The bill would be an additional tool to prevent fraud against veterans. It would impose fines, imprisonment for up to five years, or both for anyone who “knowingly engages in any scheme or artifice to defraud a veteran of veterans’ benefits, or in connection with obtaining veteran’s benefits for that veteran.”
Rep. Rooney was involved in introducing the three-year look back penalties for veterans who transferred assets for less than fair market value. It is unclear whether this bill is intended to extend to practitioners who provide veterans benefits planning and long-term care planning advice to wartime veterans seeking pension benefits. This topic does not come up in his one-minute speech to Congress when introducing the bill, which can be seen here: https://rooney.house.gov/media-center/videos/preventing-crimes-against-veterans-act-one-minute. It can be argued that it will, given that the bill uses the generic language of “and for other purposes.”
Here is the text of the entire bill as it was introduced:
HR. 4676
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an additional tool to prevent certain frauds against veterans, and for other purposes.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 2, 2016
Mr. Rooney of Florida (for himself and Mr. Deutch) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
A BILL
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an additional tool to prevent certain frauds against veterans, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the “Preventing Crimes Against Veterans Act of 2016”.
SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL TOOL TO PREVENT CERTAIN FRAUDS AGAINST VETERANS.
(a) In General.—Chapter 47 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
“§ 1041. Frauds regarding veterans’ benefits.
“(a) Whoever knowingly engages in any scheme or artifice to defraud a veteran of veterans’ benefits, or in connection with obtaining veteran’s benefits for that veteran, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
“(b) In this section—
“(1) the term ‘veteran’ has the meaning given that term in section 101 of title 38; and
“(2) the term ‘veterans’ benefits’ means any benefit provided by Federal law for a veteran.”.
(b) Clerical Amendment.—The table of sections at the beginning of chapter 47 of title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new item:
If you would like to learn more about adding Veteran Benefits Planning to your estate or elder law practice join our free webinar on Thursday, April 21st at 8EST. Just click here to reserve your spot today.
This is a FREE training webinar designed for attorneys who wish to add Estate Planning, Asset Protection, Medicaid, or VA Planning to their practice, or signifcantly improve on their existing business using our PROVEN and paint-by-number strategies for:
- Attracting higher quality clients who insist on working only with your firm (…and demanding their friends and family do the same!)
- Generating countless referrals from respected professionals and colleagues in the community.
- Automating and systematizing your practice in such a way that allows for higher volume…without work falling through the cracks, balls dropping, or having to work 80 hours a week just to keep up!
Victoria L. Collier, Co-Founder, Lawyers with Purpose, LLC, Certified Elder Law Attorney through the National Elder Law Foundation; Fellow of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys; Founder and Managing Attorney of The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC; Co-Founder of Veterans Advocates Group of America; Entrepreneur; Author; and nationally renowned Presenter.
The ILIT / TAP Distinction
Many people commonly use Irrevocable Life Insurance Trusts (ILIT) to ensure that life insurance owned by an individual is not included in their taxable estate at death. While an ILIT is a useful trust, you could accomplish far more with a TAP™ trust. So let's review an ILIT and distinguish how a TAP enhances the benefits often sought by ILITs. An ILIT is an irrevocable trust wherein the grantor retains no rights to modify the trust, benefit from the trust or control the trust. Retention of any of these rights will trigger estate tax inclusion under Internal Revenue Code Sections 2036 through 2042. An Irrevocable Life Insurance Trust may be a non-grantor trust or grantor trust, depending upon the attorney's drafting choice.
Triggering a provision of Internal Revenue Code Sections 671 through 679 will cause the inclusion of all income from the ILIT to be included in the personal income tax return of the grantor. While the grantor retains no rights to modify, control, or benefit from the trust, the grantor may be taxed on its income if a grantor trust provision is triggered. The most common of these grantor trust provisions is to allow the grantor to substitute assets of equal value, or make loans to the grantor without adequate security. By choosing grantor trust status, it essentially serves as an additional gift without having to utilize the annual gift tax exclusion, because the income taxes are paid from the grantor, rather than the trust. As a result, those additional sums are retained in the trust, thus providing additional assets to the intended beneficiaries that otherwise would have been used to pay the taxes.
One of the core elements of an ILIT is ensuring the use of Crummey powers. Crummey powers are based on the landmark case Crummey v. the Commissioner wherein the U.S. Tax Court held that granting someone the right to withdraw money funded to a trust immediately but limited to a short period of time (i.e. 30 days) was sufficient timing to deem the contribution a "present interest" and thereby trigger the annual gift tax exclusion for the contribution. A Crummey power is essential to ensure that the annual gift tax exclusions are utilized so as not to reduce the grantor's overall lifetime estate and gift tax exemption. One critical restriction under the current power, however, is that Section of the Internal Revenue Code limits the annual exclusion made to trusts to the greater of 5 percent of trust assets or $5,000. Therefore, it is essential to have a "hanging power" to ensure any contributions in excess of $5,000 or 5 percent are not deemed to be taxable gifts.
These hanging powers allow the Crummey beneficiary to continue to have the right to withdraw this excess amount, even beyond the 30-day period. For example, if a grantor contributes $42,000 to a trust for three Crummey beneficiaries and the $42,000 is the only asset of the trust and it was utilized to pay the insurance premium, then 5 percent of the trust assets only equals $2,000. Obviously, $5,000 would be greater, so $5,000 of each $14,000 contribution would be deemed to be a present interest gift and $9,000 of the contribution would "hang" until no contributions are made in a given year. At that time, an additional allocation of the annual gift would occur based on the $5,000 or 5 percent trust value limitation. Obviously, this could be problematic if these powers hang and one of your Crummey beneficiaries becomes subject to lawsuits, divorce or long-term care costs.
Another consideration with the Crummey power is to have straw Crummey beneficiaries. This is typically done by adding beneficiaries to the lifetime trust, which operates during the grantor's lifetime and provides the names of people who are not residuary beneficiaries. For example, one straw Crummey beneficiary might include spouses or other remote relatives who are willing to be a Crummey beneficiary, understanding that they are not likely to be an ultimate beneficiary. This allows additional payments each year to be contributed within the annual exclusion limit. Both ILITs and TAP trusts have Crummey provisions with hanging powers.
Neither ILITs nor TAPs are user friendly to individuals with estates less than $5,450,000, or $10,900,000 if married. These excessive restrictions need not be applied in circumstances where the total estate of the grantor plus the life insurance benefits does not exceed the estate tax limit. Obviously, the only other consideration would be if your state had an estate tax at a lower limit. If estate tax is a concern, a primary benefit of the TAP trust over the ILIT is that a TAP trust stands for Tax All Purpose trust, which means its intended benefit is far beyond the holding of life insurance. The TAP trust will typically hold life insurance policies, stocks, bonds, and other assets and/or business interests that the grantor would like to get passed on to the trust beneficiaries after death. This is especially helpful, as it will ensure that there are other assets in the trust other than the life insurance policy to accumulate assets of more than $280,000 to ensure that the entire Crummey contribution can be utilized each year with no hanging powers. In addition, the TAP trust has extensive provisions for lifetime and residuary trusts to the individuals or classes of people.
For example, sometimes a grantor will create a family-type trust that takes effect after death for the benefit of the surviving spouse and children, and upon the death of the surviving spouse, it provides separate residuary trusts for each child. Other times, clients may want to create a benefit for a class of their children for their lifetime, and at the death of the last child the balance is allocated to their then-surviving children in separate share trusts. TAP trusts are extremely flexible and powerful in ensuring that whatever assets are passed through them (life insurance, stocks, bonds, business interests, etc.) are passed on to their loved ones fully asset-protected in separate asset protection trusts or common trusts, depending on the client's goal. One of the critical distinctions in asset protection trusts after death is to ensure that the trustee is an independent trustee under Internal Revenue Code Section 672(c). One distinction to resolve the concern of naming the child beneficiary as the trustee without violating Section 672(c) is to ensure that you name a co-trustee who is adverse, a strategy far too few lawyers utilize. For example, after the death of a grantor, the surviving spouse can be the trustee with a co-trustee of one of their children. While this would be considered under the family attribution rules to be a controlled trustee, the adverse party interest ensures that the Internal Revenue Code distinctions are met. For example, if a child was a co-trustee with the spouse and approved a payment to the spouse during a family trust administration, that would be adverse to the child's residuary interest and thus satisfy the restrictions within 672(c).
The other exciting element of a TAP trust is the allowance of the spouse or trust protector to have a power of appointment to modify the beneficiaries within a class of people identified by the grantor. This can ensure that the family is able to adjust for changing circumstances after the death of the grantor to cover his or her overall planning intentions. One of the key distinctions of a TAP trust is also specific language that authorizes the accumulation of income but specifically requires the trustee to account separately for income that is accumulated and converted to principal, so as to ensure no portion of that is utilized to pay insurance premiums on the grantor. While the trust ensures that all the proper legal language is included, to be legally proper it is incumbent upon the attorney to educate the client to understand how to properly administer a trust so as not to violate that provision.
So, as you look at the distinctions between an ILIT and a TAP, it's important to note that everything an ILIT is is included in the TAP trust, but not everything in a TAP trust is included in an ILIT, so a TAP is a far more expansive trust that allows much more flexibility and use by a client. If you want to learn more about becoming a Lawyers with Purpose member to discover how the TAP trust can benefit you in your practice and, more importantly, benefit your clients consider joining our FREE webinar "The Four Essentials For A Profitable Practice" on Thursday, April 21st at 8EST. Click here to register now.
This is a FREE training webinar designed for attorneys who wish to add Estate Planning, Asset Protection, Medicaid, or VA Planning to their practice, or significantly improve on their existing business using our PROVEN and paint-by-number strategies. Reserve your spot now!
David J. Zumpano, Co-founder – Lawyers With Purpose, Founder and Senior Partner of Estate Planning Law Center
VA Health Benefits
Given how much the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has been in the news for unnecessary wait times and inappropriate scheduling practices that have negatively impacted many veterans, you may not see any value in educating your clients regarding potential VA health benefits. However, VA health benefits might offer more economical health care and/or may be an option for your clients who are underinsured. Another advantage is greater access to health care nationwide, as you may seek care at any VA health care facility once enrolled in the VA health care system.
When you enroll in VA health care, you are eligible for what is termed a Medical Benefits Package. This package consists of hospital, outpatient, and extended care services providing basic and preventive care, as well as prescription drugs, emergency care and even in some cases, services like: rehabilitative services; professional counseling and mental health services; durable medical equipment, including eyeglasses and hearing aids; home health services; reconstructive (plastic) surgery; hospice care; and dental care. What exactly is available to the recipient of VA health benefits will depend on the veteran’s unique eligibility status and whether such care or services are deemed medically necessary by VA health care providers. You receive a booklet called the Veterans Health Benefits Handbook after enrollment that gives you the specifics of your individual Medical Benefits Package.
Who qualifies for them?
If your client served in the active military, naval or air service and was discharged under any condition other than dishonorable, the client may qualify for VA health care benefits. There is a minimum duty requirement for veterans who enlisted after September 7, 1980, but there are also many exceptions both before and after this date, so you should consult 38 CFR §17.31 Duty periods defined for the definitions of duty periods applicable to eligibility for medical benefits.
Although family members, with very limited exception, cannot access the VA health care system, family members of veterans may be eligible for CHAMPVA. This is a program that provides health insurance coverage to dependents of a qualifying sponsor who is, or was at the time of death, rated permanently and totally disabled due to a service-connected disability or who died of a service-connected disability.
How do you enroll?
You can apply for VA health care by completing VA Form 10-10EZ Application for Health Benefits and submitting it in person or by mail to the enrollment coordinator at any VA Medical Center. The 10-10EZ form has sections to complete with information about military service, health insurance, and finances. Private health care insurance does not affect eligibility for VA health care. The instructions for the financial section specify that only non-service-connected and service-connected veterans rated at 0% must provide this financial information. However, they go on to state that those receiving VA pension or compensation and/or Medicaid benefits, among others, are not required to disclose financial information. In fact, after a claimant is approved for non-service-connected pension, he/she should be automatically mailed enrollment information for the VA health care system. The financial information is used to determine eligibility and copay responsibility for VA Health Benefits and – with the exceptions noted above – may be a requirement of enrollment.
More information
As part of enrollment, the applicant is assigned to a Priority Group based on the severity and nature of the applicant’s disability and/or income. There are eight Priority Groups for enrollment, from highest priority at #1 to the lowest at #8:
- Veterans with service-connected disabilities 50% or more disabling, or those unemployable due to service-connected conditions;
- Veterans with service-connected disabilities 30% or 40% disabling;
- Veterans who were Prisoners of War (POWs), were awarded the Purple Heart or Medal of Honor, whose discharge was for a service-connected disability, with service-connected disabilities 10% or 20% disabling, or special eligibility under Title 38, U.S.C. § 1151;
- Veterans receiving aid and attendance or housebound VA benefits or who have been determined by the VA to be catastrophically disabled;
- Non-service-connected veterans and non-compensable service-connected veterans rated 0% disabled with annual income below the VA’s and geographically (based on your resident ZIP code) adjusted income limits, veterans receiving VA base pension benefits, or eligible for Medicaid programs;
- Compensable service-connected veterans rated at 0% and various categories of veterans whose military service meets certain requirements;
- Veterans with gross household income below the geographically adjusted income limits (GMT) for their resident location;
- Veterans with gross household income above the VA and the geographically adjusted income limits for their resident location.
The Priority Group assignment will determine what the VA Health Benefits enrollee will pay, if anything, in copayments for their health benefits. Generally, the cost of care is free when related to service-connected disabilities, but there may be a copay for all other services, to include prescriptions.
Despite the fact that, when the VHA makes headlines, it’s often not for a good reason, the news isn’t all bad. The VA has taken corrective action to identify and resolve the issues that have plagued the VHA, including requesting the VHA to conduct an audit which then led to the Accelerating Access to Care Initiative. The VA also publishes comprehensive monthly updates detailing pending and completed appointments and average wait times that allow for oversight, and also allow a beneficiary to select a VA Medical Center with lower wait times when there is more than one in their area. For further information on Veterans Health Benefits beyond this overview, consult the website of the Veterans Health Administration at http://www.va.gov/health/.
If you aren't a Lawyers With Purpose member and want to learn more about how we can help you in your estate or elder law practice, click here and join our FREE webinar on Thursday, April 21st at 8 EST "Four Essentials For A Profitable Practice". On this one hour webinar, you'll discover:
- How to turn the complexity of Medicaid and Asset Protection Laws into simple value creation that is easy for clients to identify, allowing you to enroll more prospects into paying clients.
- Proven ways to get to YES faster and EASIER…with less "selling," pressure, or having to later overcome buyer's remorse.
- Why a confused or overwhelmed client will always say NO, and how to instead "show the law" (not TEACH IT) to more effectively earn new business.
- The key "stories" you must tell during the initial meeting (or workshop) so that clients can relate and deeply understand the value you provide (…even when your services cost 5X more than the competition down the street!).
- How to implement time management secrets of successful entrepreneurs, so that you are able to do more in your practice in less time, and have free time left over to do what you love.
- Effective ways for working on the business (not in the business) in order to master lead generation, lead conversion, and serve your clients to create consistent cash flow.
- Discover the key metrics that should be the sole focus of managing your practice…and how successful estate planning and elder law attorneys leverage tracking and reporting to reach their goals.
- Discover the five essential roles that you and your staff must fill to achieve a consistently profitable practice.
Click here to register and reserve your spot now.
By Sabrina A. Scott, Paralegal, The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC and Director of VA Services for Lawyers With Purpose.
Victoria L. Collier, Veteran of the United States Air Force, 1989-1995 and United States Army Reserves, 2001-2004. Victoria is a Certified Elder Law Attorney through the National Elder Law Foundation; Author of “47 Secret Veterans Benefits for Seniors”; Author of “Paying for Long Term Care: Financial Help for Wartime Veterans: The VA Aid & Attendance Benefit”; Founder of The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC; Co-Founder of Lawyers with Purpose; and Co-Founder of Veterans Advocate Group of America.
Is the VA Opportunity Dying?
As the Veterans Administration plans to implement new laws that would impose a three-year look back for gifts, creating penalties of up to 10 years for both transfers of assets and purchase of annuities, lawyers frequently ask me, “Are we going to be able to do any planning and help wartime veterans and their widows anymore?” What they are really asking is, “Will these changes hurt my law firm?” and “Do I need to stop doing VA benefits planning?”
The simple, candid answers are: “Yes, possibly” and “No, the clients need you now more than ever.”
There is no doubt that the current way of doing things will change. For example, “crisis” VA planning (where an individual could do planning one month and be eligible for benefits the next month) will be reduced to those clients who have limited funds who seek only pre-application consultative advice. Thus, instead of being able to charge for a plan of eligibility, the lawyer may only charge a consultation fee. As always, no one will be able to charge to assist with the completion and filing of an application for benefits.
Even though crisis VA planning will be virtually dead, a new age of pre-planning will emerge. Like Medicaid planning, wherein people structure five-year “wait and see” asset protection plans, veterans will need to construct three-year planning options. This will lead to a new opportunity for advocates to create excellent estate plans that address traditional estate planning and death distribution desires, as well as VA benefits and future Medicaid benefits. This will also lead to the opportunity for licensed insurance brokers to reposition assets into three- to five-year immediate annuities to create guaranteed income streams to pay for the client’s living expenses and health care needs during the look back period. Instead of competing for business, lawyers and financial advisors should work together to create a solid long-term care plan, or, if permissible in your state, the lawyer should consider obtaining a license to sell insurance products to keep the plan under one roof and bolster income at the same time.
The look back and resulting penalties are not the only proposed law changes. The VA also plans to limit not only the acreage that applicants may have attached to their home place, but also the deductibility of certain medical expenses, etc. With all of the changes and the remaining ambiguity in the processing of the claims due to the language of the changes, clients will need lawyers to assist with appeals. Lawyers can charge reasonable fees, as approved by the VA, after a notice of disagreement has been filed. Presumably not many lawyers will want to do appellate work, leaving the field wide open for those who do.
If you want to learn more about Lawyers With Purpose and what we have to offer our members join our FREE WEBINAR on Thursday, April 21st at 8 EST / 5 PST titled "Four Essentials For A Profitable Practice". Click here to join us. Here is just some of what you'll get:
- Discover the Four Essentials for a Profitable Practice - Turn the complexity of Medicaid and asset protection laws into simple value creation that is easy for clients to identify.
- Get Access to the Time Management Secrets of Successful Entrepreneurs - Spend your time working on the business (not in the business)…master lead generation and lead conversion and serve your clients to create consistent cash flow.
- Discover the Key Metrics that Should be the Sole Focus of Managing Your Practice - Learn how successful estate planning and elder law attorneys leverage tracking and reporting to reach their goals.
- Discover the Five Essential Roles You and Your Staff Must Fill to Achieve a Consistently Profitable Practice - And much, much more….
Click here to reserve you're spot today.
Victoria L. Collier, Veteran of the United States Air Force, 1989-1995 and United States Army Reserves, 2001-2004. Victoria is a Certified Elder Law Attorney through the National Elder Law Foundation; Author of “47 Secret Veterans Benefits for Seniors”; Author of “Paying for Long Term Care: Financial Help for Wartime Veterans: The VA Aid & Attendance Benefit”; Founder of The Elder & Disability Law Firm of Victoria L. Collier, PC; Co-Founder of Lawyers with Purpose; and Co-Founder of Veterans Advocate Group of America.